trotskyism vs leninism reddit

Usually to assess a failure correctly one can move forward to a correct practice. Leninism is a much narrower label that applies to a theory of political science. FAR RIGHT, extreme right, hard right, radical right, and ultra-right are terms used to discuss the qualitative or quantitative position a group or person occupies within right-wing politics. Cookies help us deliver our Services. Stalin, 1879-1953, was able to meet and saw off this challenge, to the extent that Trotskyism became a marginal, exterior tendency in relation to the communist movement. Didn't Stalin implement more socialist policies? share. I consider myself an anarcho-syndicalist. Neither does it seek to be an overarching sweep of both Trotskys theoretical writings, his implementing of those ideas and his followers during the entire 20th Century. As to your 2nd point I suggest you look at the Wilson archive which you access for free which contains a Mao archive. I don't mean in the theories of each of these scholars himself, but rather how are the terms are used in contemporary political theory, as in 'he was a Leninist thinker...' The same way we might call AJ Simmons a "Lockean" or Rawls a "Kantian" (the accuracy of those labels being of course beside the point). Report. — James P. Cannon (1944). The Prophet series by Isaac Deutscher is a good biography of Trotsky. I also want to be clear that although I think this is the best way to go, it is not the most complete way to go. But M-L-M based movements have only been as recent ad the 80s, although Peru ultimately was a military success its political shortcomings can be corrected to do better next time around. There are a lot of -isms within Socialism. And what did Lenin say about religion? To counter this, Lenin developed the idea of democratic centralism based on his studies of the German SPD, Democratic Centralism meaning democracy but with unity in action; in other words a strong executive to be able to make decisions and enforce some degree of ideological uniformity so the party doesn't degenerate. Stalin believed in national revolutions that would eventually link together in global communism. The most successful it has been was probably the IWW during the turn of last century. Rejecting ideological dogmatism means to be open-minded towards all ideologies and avoid strictly following a single ideology. Sort by. Pros and cons of each? Check out Eclipse and Re-emergence of the Communist Movement. From Lenin you get the idea of the Vanguard Party, which basically says that workers will not spontaneously become socialists and the party needs to build a socialist movement. "The liberation of the workers can come only through the workers themselves. 1. He threw out Lenin's New economic policy and started his five year plan and collectivizing agriculture. That seems less like a criticism and more like a statement of fact about that theory. I also heard this point first from Zizek (who is kind of disillusioned by self-management in some ways due to growing up in Yugoslavia). -- what are you implying was there if there was a vacuum in which Capitalism (or feudalism; or a capitalist-fuedalist mix) was not present? The basic idea is to reject dogmatism. I like the term "mutualism" (because I advocate for mutuality), but the more accurate label of the philosophy I follow might be "anarchism without adjectives" or "pragmatism" ("anarcho-pragmatism" if you really want to put the anarchist label into it). Marx, Lenin, Trotsky. Lenin's important innovations include the idea of a vanguard party, permanent revolution, etc. (what does it stand for or advocate) 2. The international communism that you're thinking of is better put in to the context of the failure of the Spartikans. It's not exactly the ideologies them that are bad, imo, but dogmatism. In 1903, at the party’s 2nd Congress, Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin split their Bolshevik faction from their rival Mensheviks. /r/askphilosophy aims to provide serious, well-researched answers to philosophical questions. All national economic development was affected by the laws of the world market, even though such regional factors as location, population, available resources, and … Fuck dogma. The Maoists in Phillipines are engaged in a Peoples War which has united the broadest amount of people against imperialism in the area. When that didn't happen, Stalin tried to develop a socialism that could compete with Western capitalism. Start with this document by the Indian Maoists:, New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the DebateaCommunist community. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. the anti-socialist works of Mises) that way you could figure out for yourself on how to refute those criticisms or to figure out how socialism could survive the issue presented (e.g. Main Currents of Marxism is a pretty good history but I have two concerns with it: OP could probably get the gist of what they're looking for by reading some selected source material which wont require a 400ish page commitment. Most of these are online for free of you look hard enough. Follow. It wouldn't make much sense to talk about Leninist epistemology or Leninist aesthetics. J.V. I think that for right now, and into the forseeable future, we have to interface with capitalism in order to take it apart. Other places that have had not-insignificant success are the US (Kshama Sawant is a Trotskyist), France, Vietnam, Burma, among others. Nice summary. Classical Marxism combined with Leninism and supplemented by Leon Trotsky. Trotsky: An Introduction. Browse more videos. They were able to use this power to gradually subvert Lenin and then in 1928 seize power under Stalin. I've read that anarchism is non-Marxist socialism and that that don't have an economic theory as they reject the Labour theory of value. Check out his book with Guattari 'New Lines of Alliance, New Spaces of Liberty' (older editions are titled 'Commumists Like Us', and check out 'Empire' and 'Multitude' with Hardt. I don't say this out of antagonism or trolling, but I am curious as to your opinion- you stated before you are a Zionist or are sympathetic to Zionism. It's important to note that Marxism is still alive and well. He's probably most famous for the idea of 'socialism in one country.' There are a lot of different interpretations at this point, but these are the core ideas. I would like to see the various affiliations of socialists answer and respond to: 1. As to your 2nd point I suggest you look at the Wilson archive which you access for free which contains a Mao archive. In political organization, Trotsky and his followers were famous for joining popular left wing groups and changing their ideology from within, the famous 'french turn.' He's usually invoked to describe an era in Russian history. Democratic centralism are the advantages of Leninism whereas Socialism advantages are Absence of business fluctuations, Absence of monopolistic practices, Better welfare, Economic growth, Greater efficiency. What Is Trotskyism? I do, however, see merit in understanding the history and different theories within socialist thought. Lenin (center) and Leon Trotsky (right) in discussions after the Russian Revolution. What are the downfalls of other socialist ideologies? I think that in order to achieve a communist system, it has to disregard Marx's dictatorship of the proletariat or Lenins Vanguard party. Trotskyism is the worst enemy of communism. a science. What’s the difference? In practice this means the Marxian critique of Capitalism, Historical Materialism, and the concept of class struggle, plus the desire for a socialist society based on state ownership and workers' control, ultimately to a communist society in which the state will be rendered unnecessary. If you're meeting a random communist from US, Canada, England, etc … The Origins of Trotskyism Trotskyism = Put simply, counter-Stalinism. You would focus on learning and refinement, rather than boasting about how "correct" you are. Trotsky is associated with ideas like the deformed workers state (a non-socialist, but also non-capitalist state). A point quasi-related to this is that he sometimes goes as far as making criticisms that are hard to see as actual criticisms. From Trotsky you get the theory of Permanent Revolution, which is the idea that non-capitalists countries are capable of transitioning to socialism under the leadership of a socialist party, and in fact that capitalists are too weak to transition to capitalism because of fear of a socialist revolution. If someone did, they probably really just meant what was going on in Russia in the early post-revolutionary period, not the sort of aesthetics Lenin proscribed. by Harpal Brar, London, 1993 INTRODUCTION "Lenin's methods lead to this: the party organisation first substitutes itself for the party as a whole; then the Central Committee substitutes itself for the organisation; and finally a single 'dictator' substitutes himself for the Central Committee..... "This evil-minded and morally repugnant suspicion of … Its not something a bunch of dead thinkers wrote about and which died with the Berlin Wall. So its lineage stretches from revolutionary movements like the Paris Commune all th way down to the Cultural Revolution to the Peoples War in Peru in the 80s to the Peoples War in Nepal. I think it's nice because it fuses praxis with short-term strategy. Other socialist ideologies habe not been able to be dynamic to learning as the world changes i.e. Basically, as an anarchist, you just search for the ideas that you believe affectively promote mutuality or horizontal organization. they have not been applying science. tions of Trotsky (as well as Marx and Lenin), to deny­ ing Trotsky's leading role as the military organizer of the October Revolution and accusing him of carrying out espionage for the Mikado! The term “Leninism” would be better, with Marxism-Leninism, Trotskyism & Maoism all trying to interpret what this “Leninism” is, what the universality of Leninism is. Read Marx, Lenin and Mao of course but also you can read literature by the Indian, Filipino, Peruvian, Turkish and Nepal Maoists. All political beliefs are welcome. Maoist leaning Marxists such as Louis Althusser, Samir Amin, are good as well too. It is an invaluable historical analysis of the development of Marxist thought. Cookies help us deliver our Services. Some parts of Scientitic Socialism which M-L-M contributes: The Mass Line, Peoples War, Cultural Revolution, New Democracy, Peoples Democratic Dictatorship, Three Magic Weapons(Party, United Front, and Army)(and depending on what in this may or may not be applicable to a particular country)are what will make it very successful.

Animated Tiger Characters, Paint Wooden Furniture, Pleasure Seeker Definition And Example, Monkey Shoulder Whiskey Price In Delhi, Every Monday Matters Login, Hapis Lungkot Pighati Lumbay, Naming Covalent Compounds,

Leave A Reply